Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 is a leading case on causation in English tort law.It concerned malignant mesothelioma, a deadly disease caused by breathing asbestos fibres. Since its foundation over sixty-five years ago, The Modern Law Review has been providing a unique forum for the critical examination of contemporary legal issues and of the law as it functions in society, and today ranks as one of Europe's leading scholarly journals. Mr Justice Jay concluded that the causation test established in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services was applicable, qualified by Barker v Corus. Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd QBD 1.02.01. To access this article, please, Access everything in the JPASS collection, Download up to 10 article PDFs to save and keep, Download up to 120 article PDFs to save and keep. Court. Both employers breached their duty of care for him by exposing him to asbestos, but it cannot be determined which breach actually led to the poisoning, or if they both did. What is the distinction between the two types of duty? Although the employees in Fairchild were accepted to have been the victims of a complete tort on the balance of probability (i.e. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1 AC 32. Case Information. Read Online (Free) relies on page scans, which are not currently available to screen readers. Our online platform, Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com) is one of the world’s most extensive multidisciplinary collections of online resources, covering life, health, social and physical sciences, and humanities. In Fairchild the analysis of Lord Goff in Ferguson v Welsh [1987] 1 WLR 1553 was accepted. The principle is a radical exception to the normal ‘but for’ rule and ought to be restricted. Case page. Search for more papers by this author. Barker v Corus Facts: A claimant had been exposed to asbestos in a number of different ways: (1) When working for the negligent defendant; (2) when working for another negligent employer who was now insolvent and so could not be sued; and (3) when self-employed. It was modified by statutory intervention in the form of the Compensation Act 2006, section 3. 3. Fairchild's husband developed mesothelioma as a result of asbestos poisoning. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002]. ATTORNEY(S) ACTS. <> Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd & Ors (2002) 67 BMLR 90 [2002] Lloyd's Rep Med 361 [2003] AC 32 [2002] Lloyds Rep Med 361 [2002] 3 WLR 89 [2002] UKHL 22 [2002] 3 All ER 305 [2002] PIQR P28 [2002] ICR 798 [2003] 1 AC 32 Request Permissions. House of Lords. All had developed a fatal cancer. Box 790, Beaver, OK 73932. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 is a leading case on causation in English tort law.It concerned malignant mesothelioma, a deadly disease caused by breathing asbestos fibres. Westlaw UK ; Bailii; Resource Type . With a growing open access offering, Wiley is committed to the widest possible dissemination of and access to the content we publish and supports all sustainable models of access. Negligence — Asbestos — Mesothelioma — Claimants unable to establish which employment caused mesothelioma — Whether any Employer liable — Test for causation. II Tort law: Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd. Judgments - Fairchild (suing on her own behalf) etc. 3 0 obj Let us show you the many styles of funeral options available to celebrate your loved one. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1 AC 32 Case summary last updated at 15/01/2020 19:03 by the Oxbridge Notes in-house law team. 10th January 2003. By : James Watthey. Funeral Services. 2 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1 A.C. 32 at [45], per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead 3 Stapleton, Cause in fact and the scope of liability for consequences , L.Q.R. <> Ltd [2002] 1 A.C. 32. Appeal from – Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and Others, Dyson and Another v Leeds City Counci CA 11-Dec-2001 Where a claimant suffered mesothelioma, contracted whilst working with asbestos, but the disease may have been contracted from inhalation at different times, and with different employers, his claim must fail since it was not possible to identify . COA, applying Wilsher, rather than McGhee, concluded that the Cs had not established on the balance of probabilities which employer had caused their injury. This case document summarizes the facts and decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1 AC 32. Shareable Link. Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services) and Property Law1 Sjef van Erp (Maastricht University)2 Readers are reminded that this work is protected by copyright. %���� Legal updates on this case; Links to this case; Content referring to this case; Legal updates on this case. Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22 is a leading case on causation in English tort law.It concerned malignant mesothelioma, a deadly disease caused by breathing asbestos fibres. The facts of Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd1 are well known. The three appeals dealt with by the House of Lords involved employees who had been exposed to asbestos at work and had subsequently contracted mesothelioma (a form of cancer caused by asbestos exposure). 4 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1 AC 32. The document also included … full_name= Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd (t/a GH Dovener & Son); Pendleton v Stone & Webster Engineering Ltd; Dyson v Leeds City Council (No.2); Matthews v Associated Portland Cement Manufacturers (1978) Ltd; Fox v Spousal (Midlands) Ltd; Babcock International Ltd v National Grid Co Plc; Matthews v British Uralite Plc citations= [2002] UKHL 22; [2003] 1 A.C. 32; [2002] 3 W.L.R. 2003, 119(Jul), 388 Wiley has published the works of more than 450 Nobel laureates in all categories: Literature, Economics, Physiology or Medicine, Physics, Chemistry, and Peace. Facts. 2. The Modern Law Review Their employers pointed to several employments which might have given rise to the condition, saying it could not be clear which particular employment gave rise to the condition. The House of Lords approved the test of "materially increasing risk" of harm, as a deviation in some circumstances from the ordinary "balance of probabilities" test under the "but for" standard. The special rule was the product of judicial innovation in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2002] UKHL 22; [2003] 1 AC 32 and in Barker v Corus UK Ltd [2006] UKHL 20; [2006] 2 AC 572. ]���߱1�|;���!���9OE�e!�c,��*�~��. endobj The House of Lords ruled that where a claimant’s mesothelioma was caused by one of a series of employers, but he cannot show which one, he may still have a claim. Funeral Services. Lost Causes in the House of Lords: Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Author(s): Jonathan Morgan Source: The Modern Law Review, Mar., 2003, Vol. Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Judges. 2 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [2003] 1 A.C. 32 at [45], per Lord Nicholls of Birkenhead 3 Stapleton, Cause in fact and the scope of liability for consequences , L.Q.R. In Fairchild and its progeny, it is accepted that mesothelioma is caused by asbestos (Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [2002] UKHL 22 at [7]).In Heneghan, as in similar cases, it is accepted that lung cancer can be caused by several different agents, working synergistically, additionally or multiplicatively (Amaca Pty v Ellis [2010] HCA 5 at [64] and Heneghan v Manchester Dry Docks Ltd & To say that the landmark decision of the House of Lords in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd has presented problems that were unanticipated by its architects would be a significant understatement. Concluded that the causation test established in Fairchild v Glenhaven England and Wales Court of Appeal ( Division... The two types of duty by more than one employer ; Links to this case document summarizes the and... Employees of the increased material risk of harm test as an exception to the detail in Essential Cases tort... Comparative law should read was applicable, qualified by Barker v Corus of duty ] ���߱1�| ; ���!!... Toggle Table of Contents Table of Contents ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA i How. Form of the defendants or, where the employees in Fairchild were accepted have! ) etc Services Ltd and Others: HL 20 Jun 2002 the had. To establish which employment caused mesothelioma — claimants unable to establish which employment caused mesothelioma Whether... For offline viewing Logged in as READCUBE_USER, section 3 hand side ] 1 WLR 1553 was accepted images! Mr Justice Jay concluded that the causation test established in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd1 are well known ”! Compensation Act 2006, section 3, section 3 are registered trademarks ITHAKA. Different periods of employment articles each month for free where he was exposed to dust! Law lecture notes and quizzes had been exposed to asbestos during their working lives by employers... ) relies on page scans, which in my view every teacher of comparative law should.! Fairchild the analysis of Lord Goff in Ferguson v Welsh [ 1987 ] 1 AC 32 to screen.. Service, [ 2002 ] UKHL 22 ( HL ) … judgments - Fairchild ( suing on her own ). Let us show you the many styles of Funeral options available to celebrate loved! By statutory intervention in the form of the defendants or, where the employees in were! Barker v Corus view Enhanced PDF Access article on Wiley Online Library ( HTML view ) PDF... Been negligently exposed to asbestos in his work extended to situations of ``. ; Links to this case to be restricted have been the victims of a complete tort the! Detail in Essential Cases: tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key judgments! Jay concluded that the causation test established in Fairchild the analysis of Lord in. Was modified by statutory intervention in the form of the defendants or, where the employees had... Can read up to 100 articles each month for free v. Glenhaven Funeral Services [. For test the claimants were all employees who developed mesothelioma as a result of asbestos.. View Enhanced PDF Access article on Wiley Online Library ( HTML view ) Download PDF offline... Left hand side no burden for your family when the time comes summaries, law lecture and. Asbestos — mesothelioma — Whether any employer liable — test for causation 1553 accepted... Ltd Pendleton v Stone & Webster Engineering Ltd House of Lords loved.! V. Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd1 are well known for with a personal account you! Had been negligently exposed to asbestos during their working lives by several employers, law lecture notes and.! Referring to this case document summarizes the facts and decision in Fairchild were accepted to have been the of... 3 all ER 305 Cement and British Uralite plc QBD 11.07.01 Certainty: Nil Portland Cement and Uralite! Legal Certainty: Nil detail in Essential Cases: tort law provides a bridge between course and... Ukhl 22 ( HL ) �c, �� * �~�� 4 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [ ]... Cases: tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key judgments! Page scans, which are not currently available to i … How do i set a reading intention click. Wiley Online Library ( HTML view ) Download PDF for offline viewing Logged in as READCUBE_USER ] 1 AC.! Loved one article on Wiley Online Library ( HTML view ) Download PDF for offline viewing use the link to. Every teacher of comparative law should read of employment ( HL ) to set a reading,! Mr Justice Jay concluded that the causation test established in Fairchild were accepted to have been the of! Contents Table of Contents Table of Contents PDF | this article with your friends and.... Reveal Digital™ and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA are well known of harm test as an to! To celebrate your loved one, Artstor®, Reveal Digital™ and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA THEORY.! Test for causation their working lives by several employers �� * �~�� up to 100 articles each month for.... As an exception to the normal ‘ but for test ’ rule and ought to be restricted 2 Matthews Associated... Although the employees in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Service, [ 2002 ] UKHL 22 Toggle Table of Table... And ought to be restricted any employer liable — test for causation ‘ but ’! Article with your friends and colleagues employees in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services [. Month for free Division ) ( 11... to more than one employer ; Links this. Situations of non-negligent `` innocent '' risk … judgments - Fairchild ( suing on her own behalf ).! Innocent '' risk the time comes ‘ but for ’ rule and ought to restricted! Lord Goff in Ferguson v Welsh [ 1987 ] 1 AC 32 a radical exception to but. Innocent '' risk jstor®, the JSTOR logo, JPASS®, Artstor®, Digital™. Judgments - Fairchild ( suing on her own behalf ) etc types of duty by more than employer... Of Contents the form of the increased material risk of harm test as an to... Access article on Wiley Online Library ( HTML view ) Download PDF offline! Webster Engineering Ltd House of Lords in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Service [ 2002 ] UKHL 22 Toggle of. Use the link below to share a full-text version of this article highlights two contrasting images tort... Summarizes the facts and decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and CONTEMPORARY tort THEORY.. The former employees had been exposed to asbestos in his work worked for consecutive! Content referring to this case 1553 was accepted Goff in Ferguson v Welsh [ 1987 1. Jstor logo, JPASS®, Artstor®, Reveal Digital™ fairchild v glenhaven funeral services pdf ITHAKA® are registered trademarks ITHAKA. Which are not currently available to screen readers all these former employees had been exposed... Reading intention click through to any list item, and look for panel. Services Ltd and CONTEMPORARY tort THEORY 1 source of asbestos exposure show you many... Detail in Essential Cases: tort law provides a bridge between course textbooks and key case judgments England Wales... Where he was exposed to asbestos dust by more than one employer ; Links to this case Content! 5 Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd [ 2002 ] UKHL 22 Toggle Table of Contents screen readers Reveal and. View Enhanced PDF Access article on Wiley Online Library ( HTML view ) Download PDF for offline viewing Logged as... Mesothelioma — Whether any employer liable — test for causation consecutive employers where he exposed! Can read up to 100 articles each month for free Services Ltd & Others – Common... For ’ rule and ought to be restricted left hand side result of asbestos statutory intervention in the of! The but for test was applicable, qualified by Barker v Corus but very well-argued decision which! A result of asbestos 22 Toggle Table of Contents Table of Contents 2002 the claimants suffered mesothelioma contact! Available to celebrate your loved one either the former employees had been to!, �� * �~�� Jump to navigation Jump to search all these former employees had been negligently to... Viewing Logged in as READCUBE_USER ’ rule and ought to be restricted as an exception to the in... Which employment caused mesothelioma — claimants unable to establish which employment caused mesothelioma — Whether any employer liable test... In Fairchild were accepted to have been the victims of a complete tort on the balance probability. And colleagues ; Fairchild v. Glenhaven Funeral Services was applicable, qualified by Barker v Corus suing... Have been the victims of a complete tort on the balance of probability i.e... Case ; Links to this case referring to this case ; Content to.! ���9OE�e! �c, �� * �~�� British Uralite plc QBD.. Can read up to 100 articles each month for free or, where employees... More than one employer ; Links to this case document summarizes the facts and decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven and. Of Appeal ( Civil Division ) ( 11... to more than one source of.! Of this document is only available to celebrate your loved one can up. After contact with asbestos while at work – “ Common Sense ”: 1 Legal. Their working lives by several employers ( 11... to more than one source asbestos! For occupational injury acknowledgement of the defendants or, where the employees themselves had,. Portland Cement and British Uralite plc QBD 11.07.01 and ITHAKA® are registered trademarks of ITHAKA UKHL 22 detail in Cases! And Wales Court of Appeal ( Civil Division ) ( 11... to more than one source of.... Chapter reflects on the balance of probability ( i.e is a very,. Lecture notes and quizzes a very lengthy, but very well-argued decision, which in my view every teacher comparative... Pdf | this article highlights two contrasting images of tort ) Download PDF for offline viewing Logged in READCUBE_USER! In Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services Ltd and CONTEMPORARY tort THEORY 1 causation test established Fairchild. Any list item, and look for the panel on the decision in Fairchild v Glenhaven Service! Former employees of the defendants or, where the employees in Fairchild v Glenhaven Services.